Hi Mike,
I can see by your recent acquisitions we are traveling on a similar path.
Around 18 mths ago I purchased a Garrard 301 looking for a simple alternative to my Walker that offered flexibility to try different arms and carrtridges.
I was intrigued by the drive and energy of this rim driven turntable, but it was only after the recommendations of Steve Dobbins to upgrade it with the Loricraft 301 PS, Kokomo bearing, Triplanar arm and Dynavector XVis did i realize this is a serious contender; but it didn't happen over night. The Loricraft takes around 200 hours before it breaks in, but when it happens you get a surprising airy bloom that accompanies this wonderful drive. The cartridge also needs 100 hours. I am using it on a Grand Prix base as well.
Also after wittnessing first hand Albert Porter's success with his Technics sp 10 Mk II, I bought a Mk III which I am using with an SME 312s and Air Tight PC-1.
This system sounds different from the Garrard/Triplanar/Dynavector, but where they are similar is they both share the same magical drive that translates into increased dynamics and transparancy, that I have not found in any belt drive turntable.
Althought different, I can listen for hours to either and be perfectly satisfied with the experience. It is too soon to contrast the difference, but if I were forced to give a one word comment, it would be that the Garrard system is micro and the Technics system is macro. I am certain the other components influence this perception as well.
Please stay in touch and communicate the findings of your journey.
Best. Louis

